Should the NHS be Privatised?

Should the NHS be Privatised?Would it be in the UKs surpass interest for wellness compassionate to go common soldier?Abbreviations NHS interior(a) wellness Service A&E Accident and Emergency DOH Department Of Health GP General Practitioners TCF The commonwealth fundIEA The Institute of Economic personal mattersWHO World health organisation BUPA British United Provident AssociationHSP Hospital service plan1.0 Abstract and Methodology Objective I first research and stunnedline whatthe health dish out was same(p) before the NHS was created and if it was favored intreating race. My next aim was to find out how health c atomic number 18 changed after NHSwas created and how successful it was in treating people. Thirdly, I looked tosee if patients were inured better in the mystic domain or in the open firmamentand if the service its egotism is based upon how much the workers earn per year.Fourthly, I assessed the state of the current healthcargon and what the presidential term activitys thoughts were on it.Abstract This is dissertation is focusing on the question would it be in the UKS best interest for healthcare to go cloistered and volition be addressing the current state of the NHS and the health care available. I shall talk well-nigh what the NHS is and what state it is currently. Next, I will talk astir(predicate) the private sector, how it works and basic facts near it that willgive a better picture if healthcare did go private. Then, I will go into the main arguments where I will talk about the arguments for and against before talking about the view of the three enceinte political partiesthe conservatives, toil and democrats.2.0 Introduction2.1 What is the NHS?The NHS stands for the National Health service which was first launched in 1948 after World War Two as a way to give large-minded healthcare to everyone who privations it. The function of the NHS are free to all citizens in the UK and the exclusively expectations would be for prescriptions, dental services and optical services. The NHS offers a wide run for of services that people all across the UK utilize constantly from A&E to stopping point-of-life care. Every 36 hours, 1 million patients are dealt with by the NHS present that having free non-privatized health is roundthing that benefits every resident in the UK which need a certain service (GOV.UK, 2016)2.2 What is the state of the NHS currently?Currently, the NHS is non- privatized. This path that it is free to anyone UK citizen. The NHS has been public at a time since after WW2 where the working class government brought it in after the de largeation of the second world war. During the aftermath of WW2, hardly anyone had money and the UK needed to be rebuilt after the rail at ca exampled. The NHS was brought in as a way to help the going rate of lower income class. By bringing the NHS, much and more people were able to pull back the medical examination help they desperately needed wh enever they requisiteed without having to worrying about how much they would need to pay. Since the 20th century, people reach been more than happy to be in possession of a public healthcare. Figure 1 (Smith, 2017), shows a poll taken in May 17th to 18th of the year 2017 and whether the public whished for health care to go private. This figure had indicated which service relys that health care should be public, which ones say it should be private and those who dont know or are undecided. The tidy sum shows that most of these services cast more supports that say health care should be in the public sector. There are only 3 services which have more supporters who want health care to be run by the private sector. These services are, Telephone and Internet providers (53%), Banks (53%) and Airlines (68%). Figure 2 (The Kings Fund, 2016) shows the append in how much the department of health has fagged every year and close to predications on what it is expected to be spend until 2 021. There is a bulletproof change magnitude in the amount of money used which confirmations that the NHS will be needed more money in the years to come exactly the caper is, on that point is only so much the government can give the NHS and health care which has led to in that respect being cut backs inside the NHS and has incurd legion(predicate) arguments from the hospital staff and the UKs citizens. The reason why the NHS is in constant need of money and extra funding is due to the fact that the population within the UK is constantly growing which means that more people are needed to go to hospitals for different reasons. The rise of the population could be due the increase in immigrates arriving in the UK who are in need of health care. This means that more money is needed on different drugs, different hospital equipment and staff, furthermore an increase in population will mean that more babies will be born, therefore making the maternity wards in constant use. Secondl y, the fact that in the twenty-first century, people are living longer which means that they are more likely to go to a hospital more times in there lives for many different reasons. Thirdly the rising health line of works that are starting to occur in people of diseases such(prenominal) cancer, heart problems and multiple long-term conditions means that more treatment will be needed will need to be available and most if the time, that treatment isnt cheap (The Kings Fund, 2017). The Tele chart Online watchword articles showed that the NHS in in crisis and that there had been a new record in the requireing times of A&E wards. The end 2016 to the beginning (Scott, 2017) 2.3 What would it mean for the health care to be PRIVATISED?There are already private clinics and hospitals that are also availableas well as the NHS which means that there is a variety of places that peoplemay go to. personal clinics are typically a good deal used for the wealthier peopleand this is be vitrine t hey simply have the money to pay for such treatment. Thelower and functional class however, rely on the NHS to be able to startle healthcarethat if free as they simply can non afford to be private and pay for treatment,whilst the middle class and the rich class are able to pay for such things. Already within the healthcare sector, there are some private sectorsthat people turn to as an alternative to the public sector. It is a choice thatpeople sometimes make when they need treatment that the public sector cannotprovide. In some NHS run hospitals, have brought in private wings or clinics inwhich people can use and this might also implicate in the patient getting thatprivate care for a cheaper price, depending on the hospitals (Freedom health insurance, 2017).The private sector also, already provides services for the NHS and in turn, the NHS provides the private sectors with beds for their patients. The is a sort of collaboration at this point and to change the healthcare sector c ompletely to private might throw the balance that the healthcare sector has already established. The services that the private sector has provides for the NHS includes long term residential care for people who need it, care of the elderly, termi population of a pregnancy psychiatric care(US National Libary of Medicine, 2002). Privatized healthcare would mean that the criticizes on the UK would have to pay for treatment that is originally paid for by the government downstairs the NHS. This means that hospital promises, GP visits, optician visits, dentist visits will all have to be aid for the person doing this. Already, the Guardian has stated that there is a growing trend where patients from England are now paying for surgery to avoid long waiting times and this is showing that this problem that are occurring in the NHS are having a big preserve on the number of people using this service (The Guardian, 2017). 3. The Private sector Private healthcare is a sectorthat includes clini cs and hospitals which are run by companies, charitiesorganisations. Private healthcare is run usually phratryarate from the NHS. Whenusing the private sector, the fees must be paid since the NHS does not coverthe cost of any type of private care available. When using the private sector,the patient is usually able to choose which hospital or clinic that they cantreat for and depending on how much they pay, the time spent in the hospitalcan be longer than if the patient had undergone treatment by the NHS. Theprivate sector is a place where many people often go to for a second opinion ifthey need it (Freedom health insurance, 2017).3.1 How does it work?Until 1948, before WWII, thehealthcare within the UK was private. The NHS didnt exist which meant thathealthcare was set up by private medical facilities, medical services whichcharged a lot of money for their services. There were also charities andvoluntary hospitals for those who couldnt pay the medical fees that came fromthe other companies. The health insurance sector was first developed in the midst of1940 and 1947 based on HSP/PPP Healthcare and several schemed into BUPA (US National Libary of Medicine, 2002).In 1997, in the UK, there were12 million people who were covered for private care and the medical expensesthat came with it. This is only about 75% of the type of care that is through with(p) inthe private sector. Commonly, private medical insurance occurs more among olderpeople who start to become in need to more need to go to visit a GP or go tohospital. And of those more older people, they are usually are in a bettersocial class as they usually are able to pay for it without also much risk ofgetting in dept. (US National Libary of Medicine, 2002).3. Arguments for the Privatization of HealthcareIn this section, I will be arguing why it would be in the UKs bestinterest for healthcare to go private. That would mean changing it from what itis now and bellow, there are a few reasons to why it should be done3.1 The wait is overThe having private health care in the UK, it could firstly reduce thewaiting times for patients in the UK. Currently, on a daily basis, whenarriving in a hospital there is a wait before a person gets seen by a doctor.This wait to a highly danger to a person who had a serious illness or injurycould mean the difference between life economy(a) treatment or serious problems (The Medic Portal, 2018). Currently, thewaiting time in A&E should be 4 hours per patient. However, Holly Dorning,a resear4ch analyst and report former has stated that hospitals are finding itharder each day to keep to that 4 hours before a patient has become breeched. Theour hour A&E fool had declined from the national expectation since 2010.Even the top 10% hospitals had not beaten this target and breached it. (The Nuffield Trust, 2015)Co-author Holly Droning, Research analyst at the Nuffield Trust state The vast majority of patients are stillreceiving care within the target times, but our analysis shows thatdeteriorating access to services is starting to affect patients attending eventhe best-performing hospitals Weve cognize that hospitals have been strugglingto meet the four-hour A&E target for a while. But the fact that we arestarting to see problems in other areas, like access to planned treatment, is areal concern. As this study makes clear, warning lights are now starting toflash across the wider hospital system. This shows that this problem ofwaiting had been pointed out as a problem. This is worrying as the differencebetween even 5 minutes could mean the different between saving a patients life(The Nuffield Trust, 2015).However, with private care, this problem is likely to decrease as itwould lessen the pressure on the NHS and it will means that patients gettreatment and attention needed and this might lead to problems being discovereda lot quicker.3.2 Comparing to other countriesReports from the IEA showed a very concerning different between the cancer treatment in the UK and other countries in the EU. It was stated that if the UKS lung, bowel, breast and prostate cancer were treated in the Netherlands instead of being treated in the UK, more than 9,000 lives would be saved every year. This is a huge amount of people and that shows that there is distinctly a flaw in the UKs healthcare for cancer However, this is not the end, if those patients were treated in Germany, more than 12,000 lives would be saved. If those cancer patients had been treated in Belgium, more than 14,000 patients would have been saved. Theses number are too big of a difference. Theses suggesting that having public health care, whilst it might have a good idea in the respect that it means that everyone in the UK has equal prospect and the freedom of choice in what healthcare sector they call to choose from, this isnt important if patients who are critically ill are dying dependable being there isnt a private health care. Those lives that could have been sa ved could be prevented(Coppin, 2017)According the WHO, OECD and TCF have done research other healthcare in the UK in comparison to other EU countries. It was found out that the NHS now, ranks in the bottom third of developed countries. In the heath outcome category, it is graded as second to last. This research clearly shows the poor record that UK had in keeping people alive. This shows that the reputation the auk had of having a good healthcare system is clearly unjustified and changes are need to be made (Coppin, 2017). 3.3 People who need it get helpAnother positive for the privatization of healthcare is that by havingobligatory private healthcare, it would reduce the amount of time wastingpatients that hospital get. This is because people are less likely to go to thedoctors and hospitals for no actual reasons as they wouldnt want to be ahospital bill if they didnt need to visit the hospital. With there being lessencouragement to just go to the doctors, it will confirmation th ere being hospitalblockages and it will mean that patients in need of actual care can get it alot fast(a)er than it used to (The Medic Portal, 2018)Also, by having less reason to just visit the hospital, it could meanthat people will try and take better care of their health more so that whenthey do need to visit the doctors, go to GPs they are well aware that they areneed of help and arent pass money of something unimportant. 4. Arguments against the privatization of healthcareThe argument against theprivatization of health care is the argument which is staying that makinghealthcare in the UK private wouldnt be un the UKs best interest. Bellow,there are a few reasons to why that is4.1 The good case An argument against the privatization of health care is the moral case.It is called the moral case as it would not be morally right for the governmentto send the UK back to how it used to be and hinder the development of the UKitself. It wouldnt be morally right for the lower and worki ng lass whostruggle to pay for their daily living, to be made to pay for healthcare whichthey need. Being able to go to the doctors when needed is the best thing thatthey could be given and to have that taken away from them will only cause themto stop going it things like GP for much need annual check-ups. wantingcheck-ups just to save money my cost someones life in the end Well knowscientist Stephen Hawkins has said that the privatization of the healthcare isnot the best way forwards for the UK. By following the American healthcare ofthe insurance systems and private companies running healthcare, we would not beable to help the nation as the working class who do not have the means for thatsort of healthcare. The NHS was originally made so that everyone could beentitled to having free healthcare when they needed it and this was part of areform to make the UK great. By privatizing healthcare, all the governmentwould b doing is sending us back in the past where the close rate was hi gh andthe average expectance was lower than it is now (The workweek Ltd, 2017). Hawkins himself wrote in the guardian, he believed that the NHS is thefairest wat to deliver healthcare, and by this, he meant that it is the bestway for the government to look after UK citizens from afar and is a systemwhich doesnt judge on the wealth or status of a person, but on their health. (The Week Ltd, 2017).Figure 4 (ONS Digital, 2015) shows a table of life expectances from1841 to 2001. This data was taken from ONS and it clearly shows an increase inlife expectancy and this figure could continue to increase of the UK continuesto do this. Although there are other factors which has contributed to ther lifeexpectancy increasing, having public healthcare that people dont need pay formeans that people can go to hospital anytime instead of worrying about spendingmoney in case there is something wrong. These hospital visits based on whimsare also the ones who help find diseases, illnesses and conditio ns early enoughto prevent any further damage. That could save a persons life. However, ifthere was private care, indeed things life high blood pressure might exist moredue to the stress of having to pay the fees just to get the medical attentionneeded. Furthermore, the graph on figure 4 might change if healthcare is privatized. From 1841 to 2011, the life expectancy rate had doubled for both male and female and this graph is only an average up to 2011. That figure had probably increased since due to many different ideas that can be done on people for free under the NHS.4.2 The public health is more expeditious than private care Hawking also told the Royal Society of Medicine that Internationalcomparisons indicate that the most efficient way to provide good health care isfor the service to be publicly funded and publicly run. This suggests thatother countries who run on private healthcare might not be doing as well aswhat we are lead to think (The Week Ltd, 2017). The evidence for this is the 2012 study which was led by a US-Bosnianteam who looked at the healthcare system of different countries. America,Germany and Canada. Data from OECD in 2000 showed that America which runs ona privatized healthcare had spent the most money out of the three. WhilstGermany was second and Canada was last. Germany and Canada both run off publichealth care and the figures show that clearly despite the fact that America isrunning on private healthcare, meaning that the citizens pay, they end up stillpaying a of money. (AVICENA, 2012)4.3 Choices for patientsBy having not only a public healthcare systm and a private sector, thisallows for the UKs citizens to be given a choice. The choices to go to thepublic healthcare is a decision that most working class must choose, some ofthem simply do not have the money to be able to choose where to go. The factthat they are even able to call an ambulance or walk into a hospital withouthaving to worry about to pay is something that stops a lot of stress and ishealth for them. Stress is never good for people and the added stress of havingto worry about how they will pay for the treatment might only cause moreproblems than solve it. Whilst some, prefer to stick to public health care,other do not and often choose to go to the private sector. This is due to thefact that the private sector is more likely to explore was difficult proceduresand more experimental procedures than design hospitals and patients have betterchoice to where they are being treated. For those who can afford to go private,it is a good alternative (The Week Ltd, 2017).To be able to have a choice in where you go is a privilege that not manypeople around the world get to have and with this sort of power, the best thingto do would be too keep being able to choose, keeping this privilege would helpmany people within the UK. 5. The governments on the privatization of health care This debate of whether health carebeing private is the best things for the UK all lies in the hands of thegovernment. Whilst the public can have their say through the democratic votingsystem, it is the government who mostly have the power and that is dangerous Doctors claim that the government isdeliberately creating health crisis to privatize the NHS (Bodkin, 2017)Dr Chaand Nagpaul BMA chairman said As doctors we strive to providesafe, quality care to our patients. Yet we appear set up to fail. We trailEuropean nations. With significantly fewer doctors and hospitals beds per headand spends 10 million less per year on out health service which suggeststhat the government are clearly not trying to help the current crisis that isbeginning to hold up as a result of not enough spaces in hospitals to accommodatethe need of the public (Bodkin, 2017)DOH spokeswomen said This motion sadly has no blood with reality while of course there are pressures on the frontline, the government is nowspending more that aby in history on the NHS, has leftfield themselves to de cide onuse of the private sector, and public satisfaction is not the highest it hasbeen in all but three of the last 30 years. This story contradictsthat one Dr Nagpaul has said, but this still doesnt disprove the fact thatthere may be major shortages within the NHS government are purposefully nottrying to solve (Bodkin, 2017).5.1 The Conservatives Currently, it is the conservatives who are in power with Theresa Maybeing prime minister. This argument had been occurring even before May was putin power, but now that she is in power her and the government already haveideas to what the future holds.Recent election and polls have shown that there is a large fate ofthe public who wish to have public healthcare. However, the conservatives hadsaid that the NHS and its free healthcare is too expensive to run and that it failsto work in the interest patients. May is said to have been convinced that thebenefits of this change will outweigh the risks. The cutting of running costsand joining u p the sectors if the best move for the UK (Vize, 2017). The conservatives and their constant rivals are at opposite ends of theargument, however, with the conservatives being current in power, this might meanthat they have a slight advantage over the labour, but this of course isntneedfully true. But what is true, is that both parties will face manyproblems as their solution both have flaws that might be hard to fix (Vize, 2017). 5.2 LabourIt was the labour party who created the NHS all those years ago and thehave stated that it was their proudestachievement, providing universal healthcare for all on the basis of need, freeat the point of use. In this argument over whether the healthcare would bebetter being private, the labour party have stuck to their old policy and saythat healthcare would be better if it was public. Labour have said that theyplan on investing to the NS to give the citizens of the UK a modern andwell-resourced service that is available whenever it is needed. The labourparty wish to make the NHS into world-class quality and for all patient toreceive the best care from the staff (Labour, 2018).By guaranteeing access totreatment within 18 weeks, we will take one million people off NHS waiting lists by the end of the nextParliamentWe will ensure all NHS patients get fast access to the mosteffective new drugs and treatments, and insist on value-for-money agreementswith pharmaceutical companies (Labour, 2018) They have made a lot of promises thatthe nation hopes to see be done and if they do, it would be one step intomoving healthcare in the UK into the future. Currently, the NHS is seen to bein crisis ad many people, government and normal citizens wish to see the crisisend and for the NHS to move on and improve. Labour say that they will guaranteetoo meet the 4-hour A&E target, something that even the top hospitals havebeen struggling to do.5.3 promiscuous DemocratesThe Liberal Democrats are the 3rd biggest political party and in this debate, t hey dont want healthcare to turn private, however, for that to be prevented, they have said that some sacrificed must be made. The Lib Dems leader Tim Farron had told his party that conference takes would be raised to pay for healthcare in a bid to rebrand the NHS. It will become a fully taxpayer-funded service (Elgot, 2016)If the only way to fund a healthservice that meets the needs of everyone is to raise taxes, Liberal Democratswill raise taxes he said, declare to campaign to transform the NHS intothe National Health and Care Service. Farron believed that over the years, thegovernment has trying to hide this problem of the NHS failing before by puttingin small term solutions and not really actually solving problems, and thegovernment havent really been looking at what it will take to not only keepthe NHS and its free healthcare, but also to give people the best care andtreatment, which they deserve. He says that the best way to go forward is byhaving a National Health and Care s ervice (Elgot, 2016).5.4 In conclusion In conclusion, the Conservatives wish to have a privatized healthcare.The labour party wish to have the NHS stay and for healthcare to continue to bepublic. And finally, the Liberal Democrats wish to have a National Health addcare system. All three government want to different things and have differentyet similar plans for the future of healthcare.6.0 Conclusion In this dissertation, the chosen title was would it in be in the UKsbest interest for healthcare to go private?. Within the dissertation, therehave been arguments for and against that campaign, what the different politicalparties say and what it would mean to turn the public sector into a privatesectorThe arguments for the privatization of healthcare had shown that havingprivate healthcare would solve many problems that the NHS currently had. Thefirst argument was that waiting times would decrease. Secondly, people who needit will get the medical help needed and thirdly, when comparing it to othercountries in general, it was shown that the UKs pubic healthcare is clearlyone of the worst healthcares in developed countries. This then showed thatthere was obvious need for change in order for lives to be saved.The arguments against the privatization of healthcare have shown thatthere would moral implications if it was done. The in fact, the public sectoris actually more efficient than the private sector. Thirdly, the citizens ofthe UK will be able to get a choice to where they go for medical care. Allthese reasons are important as these are things that would be affected ifhealthcare was privatized. The NHS is a big part of the UK and the change willmight cause a backlash that the government cannot deal with.In conclusion, after analyzing both sides of the argument and looking atwhat the people in power the government believe and the promised that theywish to make, the advice I would give is that, healthcare, shouldnt beprivatized. This is due to the fact that, despi te there being many validreasons for there being a privatized sector, the fact is, it would be dangerousfor something so big that will cause a huge impact on a whole country. Thischange could cause mass chaos and that and the points outlined in the argumentsagainst, are the reasons why I advise that health care is not privatized. BibliographyAVICENA, 2012. Empirical Evidence and International Comparisons.. Online acquirable at https//www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3633404/table/T1/Accessed 1 January 2018.Bodkin, H., 2017. Government is deliberately creating a health crisis to privatise the NHS, doctors claim. Online functional at http//www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/06/27/government-deliberately-creating-health-crisis-privatise-nhs/Accessed 7 declination 2017.Coppin, F., 2017. The big debate we need to privatise the NHS. Online uncommitted at http//thebadgeronline.com/2017/03/big-debate-need-privatise-nhs/Accessed 6 November 2017.Elgot, J., 2016. Lib Dems will turn NHS into National Health and Care Service, says Farron. Online Available at https//www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/sep/20/lib-dems-will-turn-nhs-into-national-health-and-care-service-says-farronAccessed 7 December 2017.Freedom health insurance, 2017. About Private Healthcare. Online Available at https//www.freedomhealthinsurance.co.uk/about-private-healthcareAccessed 27 December 2017.GOV.UK, 2016. The NHS in England. Online Available at https//www.nhs.uk/NHSEngland/thenhs/about/Pages/overview.aspxAccessed 6 October 2017.Labour, 2018. Healthcare for all. Online Available at https//labour.org.uk/manifesto/healthcare-for-all/Accessed 27 December 2017.ONS Digital, 2015. How has life expectancy changed over time?. Online Available at https//visual.ons.gov.uk/how-has-life-expectancy-changed-over-time/ Accessed 7 December 2017.Scott, P., 2017. NHS in crisis? The charts that show how health service performance hit record lows in December. Online Available at http//www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/0 2/09/nhs-crisis-charts-show-health-service-performance-hit-record/Accessed 1 January 2018.Smith, M., 2017. Nationalisation vs privatisation the public view. Online Available at https//yougov.co.uk/news/2017/05/19/nationalisation-vs-privatisation-public-view/ Accessed 27 December 2017.The Guardian, 2017. The Guardian view on the NHS crisis private treatment is not the answer. Online Available at https//www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/sep/11/the-guardian-view-on-the-nhs-crisis-private-treatment-is-not-the-answerAccessed 6 October 2017.The Kings Fund, 2014. Commission on the future of Health and Social Care in England.Online Available at https//www.kingsfund.org.uk/sites/default/files/media/commission-appendix-uk-private-health-market.pdfAccessed 23 January 2018.The Kings Fund, 2016. The NHS budget and how it has changed. Online Available at https//www.kingsfund.org.uk/projects/nhs-in-a-nutshell/nhs-budgetAccessed 6 October 2017.The Kings Fund, 2017. Does the NHS need more mone y?. Online Available at https//www.kingsfund.org.uk/publications/articles/does-nhs-need-more-moneyAccessed 1 January 2018.The Medic Portal, 2018. What are the arguments for private healthcare in the UK?. Online Available at https//www.themedicportal.com/nhs-hot-topics-private-healthcare-and-privatisation/Accessed 1 January 2018.The Nuffield Trust, 2015. No quick fixes for growing hospital waiting times, the Nuffield Trust warns. Online Available at https//www.nuffieldtrust.org.uk/news-item/no-quick-fixes-for-growing-hospital-waiting-times-the-nuffield-trust-warns?gclid=CjwKCAiAqbvTBRAPEiwANEkyCLjCqzE-C3odDoC-RR22ol3Uyvv9o9n0hH01bHVd0VcJMX3DHlB6gBoCt3EQAvD_BwEAccessed 6 November 2017.The Week Ltd, 2017. Pros and cons of privatising the NHS. Online Available at http//www.theweek.co.uk/nhs/63360/pros-and-cons-of-privatising-the-nhsAccessed 10 October 2017.US National Libary of Medicine, 2002. Role of private sector in United Kingdom healthcare system. Online Available at https//www.ncb i.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1118448/Accessed 7 December 2017.Vize, R., 2017. What do the party manifestos mean for the NHS?. Online Available at https//www.theguardian.com/healthcare-network/2017/may/19/party-manifestos-nhs-general-electionAccessed 7 December 2017.